Bus 624 week 4 discussion 1

 

Prior to beginning work on this discussion,

Discuss how you would rule if you were the judge in this case.

  • Did Mr. Higgins infringe on Ms. Garner’s Patent?
  • Is Ms. Garner’s patent valid?
  • Does Ms. Garner’s patent meet the requirements of being novel, non-obvious, and having utility? Explain why or why not.

Your initial response should be a minimum of 200 words.

Links to videos:

 https://www.viddler.com/embed/37be50a1/?f=1&autoplay=0&player=full&disablebranding=0 

 https://www.viddler.com/embed/8fc0ee71/?f=1&autoplay=0&player=full&disablebranding=0 

 https://www.viddler.com/embed/eef250e4/?f=1&autoplay=0&player=full&disablebranding=0 

 https://www.viddler.com/embed/c0e674c8/?f=1&autoplay=0&player=full&disablebranding=0 

 https://www.viddler.com/embed/36326200/?f=1&autoplay=0&player=full&disablebranding=0 

Looking for a similar assignment? Get help from our qualified experts!

Our specialized Assignment Writers can help you with your custom paper today. 100% written from scratch

Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper