Question 1 :
Chapter 6 presented the approach the LEGO Group used to implement ERM, and chapter 9 presented a discussion and case study on implementing ERM in a higher education environment. Please explain how ERM adoption and implementation in the higher education (HE) environment differs from the for-profit environment. Cite specific examples from this week’s readings.
To complete this assignment, you must do the following:
A) Create a new thread by Thursday. As indicated above, explain how ERM adoption and implementation in the higher education (HE) environment differs from the for-profit environment. Cite specific examples from this week’s readings. In your explanation, discuss at least three points or aspects in which the implementing ERM in the two environments differ.
B) Select AT LEAST two (2) other students’ threads and post substantive comments on those threads, evaluating the pros and cons of that student’s recommendations. Your comments should extend the conversation started with the thread. Post by Sunday due date in the syllabus.
ALL original posts and comments must be substantive. (I’m looking for about a paragraph – not just “I agree.”)
NOTE: These discussions should be informal discussions, NOT research papers. If you MUST directly quote a resource, then cite it properly. However, I would much rather simply read your words.
infotech in a global economy
List the benefits associated with stakeholder engagement in governance.
The most intensive engagement in involving stakeholders in decision making is ___ && ___
The core characteristics of computational models and public policy include:
Values attributed to technology, decision-making, and politics.
Values attributed to the designer, model, and decision-making process.
Values attributed to the model, decision-making process, and data.
Values attributed to public policy, data, and politics.
Describe technological instrumentalism.