Explain the Research Question(s) for your action research study and the importance of their application.

Building Capacity in the Collaborative Process – What’s Your Focus?

The sharing of ideas can be a beneficial process during collaboration (Atweh, Kemmis, & Weeks, 1998; Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee, 2002). Those researchers and professionals in the field who support collaborative learning strongly believe that sharing ideas with others “increases interest among the participants but also promotes critical thinking” (Gokhale, 1995, para 2). Further, “collaboration lets you share responsibility and combine the knowledge, creativity, and experiences of others” (Unknown (n.d.) Often, when we collaborate through the exploration and insightful sharing of each other’s ideas, we can systematically improve upon our own.

As a way of further developing your action research and communicating your ideas to your classmates, you now have the opportunity to accomplish both while providing feedback to your class peers. The purpose of this process is twofold. First, it promotes your critical thinking and, second, it gives you an opportunity to share your experiences in the research design. In summary, the process of providing collaborative feedback builds capacity in your thought process and in the implementation of your action research study.

Initial Post: Respond to the following prompts in relation to your own study in detailed, yet succinctly written paragraphs.

  • Post the link to your Action Research Proposal and/or upload the document/presentation from your EDU671.
  • Describe the Area of Focus for your action research study.
  • Explain the Research Question(s) for your action research study and the importance of their application.
  • Describe the individual roles of each research participant in your action research study.

Your initial post functions as a springboard for peers and the instructor to respond to you with constructive ideas and feedback about your study. You share your Action Research Proposal with peers to obtain ideas and feedback on your proposal. If you have already identified a change to your proposal (e.g., research questions, population, setting, intervention, data collection techniques or personnel involved in your project) make those changes before you share your presentation.

Note: In Week Four you will describe the roles and responsibilities of the identified personnel and the specific leadership strategies you observed. This initial process in this discussion supports the Week Four activity.  


Links to other tutorials for EDU 675

Just click on Assignment/Discussion name to go to respective tutorial.

·         EDU 675 Week 1 Assignment ( Data Collection Strategies – Value and Appropriateness )

·         EDU 675 Week 1 Discussion ( Building Capacity in the Collaborative Process – What’s Your Focus )

·         EDU 675 Week 2 Assignment ( How is My Research Relevant – A Work in Progress )

·         EDU 675 Week 2 Discussion ( Action Research – What it Means to You )

·         EDU 675 Week 3 Assignment ( Ongoing Analysis and Reflection )

·         EDU 675 Week 3 Discussion ( Leadership Conference Poster Session )

·         EDU 675 Week 4 Assignment ( Formative Evaluation – Interpretation )

·         EDU 675 Week 4 Discussion ( Observation Reconnaissance )

·         EDU 675 Week 5 Discussion 1 ( School Leaders – Engage! )

·         EDU 675 Week 5 Discussion 2 ( Data Analysis and Early Feedback )

·         EDU 675 Week 6 Assignment ( Final Project – Action Research Formal Presentation of Findings )

·         EDU 675 Week 6 Discussion ( Impact Reflection )